An Analysis of Old Major’s Speech: Animal Farm Essay

Having served the Indian Imperial Police in Burma, George Orwell received direct experience with the lower-class of society. After joining the Republican forces in the Spanish Civil War he grew critical of the communists, and later he fought the communists in Spain, himself. This was the reason he wrote Animal Farm: to illustrate the dangers that communism, implemented in a harsh way, often led to. In this way, it could be classified as satire, i. e.on the corruption of the Russian revolution, not on communism itself. He wrote it as an anthropomorphic allegory, that is to say that the story of the Russian Revolution was written with the characters being animals rather than humans, and that it was not telling the story literally, rather it was figurative. In my opinion, this was done to engage the reader more fully and to bypass any stereotypes the reader may have about any one of the real-life characters. Out of these characters, Old Major of the Animal Farm represents Karl Marx who can be considered â€Å"the father of communist ideology† and of whom â€Å"Marxism† was named after. In the same way, Old Major was the â€Å"father of animalism† and he was the first one to articulate its ideas. Old Major’s name could be described as an aptonym; both the name he was exhibited with i. e. Willingdon Beauty and the name the animals knew him by i. e. Old Major. The Author uses the stereotype of â€Å"old, experienced and wise, hence highly regarded and respected†. His names represent these ideas: â€Å"Old† signifies age; â€Å"Major† signifies that he is respected due to his age; â€Å"Willingdon† may signify his leadership quality and â€Å"Beauty† signifies another reason he was highly regarded and respected. Due to his age, him being wise and his immense experience, both of which made him unique, the animals would naturally give him authority. He was a â€Å"prize middle white boar† i. e. unique in his appearance, but he was balanced with having â€Å"a wise and benevolent appearance†. This balance is the reason he engendered such respect that the animals would lose an hour of sleep to listen to his speech. Although his elderliness is being emphasised by him being â€Å"12 years old†, the author goes on to say that â€Å"he was still a majestic looking pig, with a wise and benevolent appearance in spite of the fact that his tushes were never cut†. The fact that his tushes were never cut yet there was still a majestic look on him, indicates that he was unique and his appearance was true, not artificial. During Old Major’s speech, he was not only a person of honour, but he is placed in a position of honour. He places himself on â€Å"a raised platform, under a lantern†, in a place of importance for the animals i.e. the barn, above the other animals, singling himself above the others and giving himself the authority he needed. In addition to this, he was there before any other animal, giving them the impression of promptness and strengthening their awareness of the graveness of the topic he was about to speak about. He took all these measures in order that he would have as much authority in the eyes of the other animals, as it would take so that it would make it impossible for the others to oppose him during the speech. It was night time: the animals were exhausted from their work and this was intensified by the fact that they were missing sleep. The threats of Mr Jones had disappeared and it was the ideal time for the animals to reflect on the reasons for their misery. Old Major had chosen the best time. The fact that they were tired may have made it even more likely for them to submit to Old Major’s view on their lives and his solutions to their problems. It would be natural for them to accept his conclusions given the circumstances they were in and the authority he had. Old Major waited till the animals were all present and silent. This also alludes to the importance of the topic he was going to talk about since it was his intention for all the animals to know about it and to give it their ultimate commitment. This was the importance of the occasion. One of the main components of his speech was the dream he claimed he had. In the eyes of the animals, Old Major, due to his high standing amongst them, was totally trustworthy and truthful. Hence the fact that he claimed he had learnt a song that was sung by the ancient animals, and which had been long forgotten, a song which appealed to their innermost cores, linked him up with superior powers in the eyes of the animals. In this manner, the dream led the animals to putting all their trust in Old Major’s ideas, since he was, in their eyes, impossible to be contradicted. With this in mind, the animals naturally fell â€Å"into the wildest excitement† upon Old Major’s recitation of the song. It threw hope into their hearts for change, made them wishful of the future and inspired them to work for the rebellion. It was also Old Major’s experience which made his dream impossible to contradict: he was unique amongst them due to his vast experience, something which no other animal on the farm could compete with, and it was based on this that he made his predictions of the future. A feature of the speech, which was arguably one of the most effective in terms of persuasion of the animals, was Old Major’s use of inclusive language i. e. language which included and united the audience i. e. the animals. He uses this technique throughout the speech, but the effect is emphasised in the 5th and 6th paragraphs. In the 5th paragraph, after mentioning the enemy, man, he justifies his conclusion about them citing the fact that man is incapable of doing the work animals do. Old Major declares about man, â€Å"he does not give milk, he does not lay eggs, he is too weak to pull the plough, he cannot run fast enough to catch the rabbits†. By mentioning this, he is not only illustrating the superiority of animal over man, but he is also engaging the animals in making them proud of what they do as opposed to men. Old Major does not confine himself to speaking (generally), rather he chooses to speak directly to each animal, capturing their fullest engagement with rhetorical questions on subjects of utmost concern for them. He emphasises the corruption of man with regards to these matters. This ultimately leads to the animals anger and outrage at the humans, further uniting them against man. He says, â€Å"You cows†¦ how many thousands of gallon of milk have you given during the last year? And what has happened to that milk which should have been breeding up sturdy calves? Every drop of it has gone down the throats of our enemies†. He repeats this with regards to the hens, † And you hens, how many eggs have you laid this year, and how many of those eggs ever hatched into chickens? â€Å". He even singles out Clover reminding her of the fate of her foals who were all sold. He emphasises his uniqueness in that he was allowed to reach his age, he uses himself as the ideal model and describes his life as â€Å"the natural life of a pig†. He highlights the fate of the porkers, saying â€Å"you will scream your lives at the block within a year†. He mentions Boxer, who was described earlier on in the text as â€Å"as strong as any two ordinary horses put together†, and describes his ultimate fate to be with the knackers who will kill him for the fox-hounds. As I have illustrated, Old Major combines inclusive language, rhetorical questions on issues of utmost concern for the audience, such as the horrors Mr Jones had prepared for their death.

Baseball Essay Topics: the Ultimate Convenience!

Baseball Essay Topics: the Ultimate Convenience! Now baseball caps can be found in a lot of styles and colours. All in all of the baseball business started to thrive. Interesting truth about baseball. The absolute most important baseball competition. Baseball has ever been a place people appear to turn to in times of need. People simply have to be reminded. They love making the time to plan a trip to a game of their favorite team. If you're going to initiate a game, you better make sure you receive all the men and women you demand. There's no point if one selects a topic that isn't even understandable. The huge talk on baseball at the present time is the steroid issue. True love, to put it differently. Baseball Essay Topics Options Hitting a baseball also needs a high degree of hand-eye coordination. Batters step until the plate. A Easton bat is among the lightest bats utilized for softball, letting the batter to acquire her hands out faster for the pitch. Bats made from scandium aluminum are definitely the most popular today. The previous 150 years have observed many critical adjustments to the baseball bat, and the plan of the bat proceeds to evolve. In the National League, the pitcher is needed to bat, per the standard rules. Softball players have quicker reaction time because of the simple fact that there is not as much friction on the area and a pitcher is far closer. There are a lot of well-known baseball players which were established from such a little team and eventually made it to the important league. Baseball Essay Topics for Dummies Baseball continues to have a wide effect on popular culture, both in america and elsewhere. Ball selection proved to be a crucial strategy and a crucial advantage of home-field advantage. In the period following the war, the 2 leagues enjoyed a long duration of growth. Following this event, lots of baseball teams began to form all over america. It is one of the most popular sports in the United States of America, and continues to gain popularity across the world for the exciting sport it is. It's said that baseball was played with diverse variations of the game since the 18th century in various places throughout the nation. What You Can Do About Baseball Essay Topics Beginning in the Next Eight Minutes Despite your involvement in the game, you would like to compose a fantastic essay on baseball to acquire a great mark. If you know nothing about baseball, this is the main portion of the task for you. There are quite a lot of stories connected with the introduction of the baseball. At the start of the essay, it is logical to tell what baseball is. Things You Should Know About Baseball Essay Topics Baseball has existed for a while now but is still among the mo st beloved games in todays sports world. It is a game that embodies the American spirit. As it happens, the actual history of baseball is a bit more complicated than the Doubleday legend. The actual history of baseball is really a bit complicated, and the genuine originsremain uncertain. The Lost Secret of Baseball Essay Topics Undoubtedly, the simplicity of obtaining a basketball game started is a significant component in making it more popular. There's no coin flip to ascertain who receives the ball first in sudden death overtime. The players aren't gathered along an offensive line or elbow-to-elbow below a basket. In fact, seeing your favourite player wearing their uniforms is a remarkable feeling already. After receiving the undertaking, you understand what it is you're likely to write about. Always make sure to take a look at the review my essay section of any writing service website you're contemplating using. Describe some tasks that you've accomplished over the last two years with no connection to academic studies. In a nutshell, the service exists, so should you wish to use it in order to find a top essay, that's reason enough.

Professionalism in Forensics Computing - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 10 Words: 3046 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Law Essay Type Case study Did you like this example? Professionalism in Forensics Computing For the first time following the case of Jones v Kaney [UKSC 2011, 13] experts are open to being challenged under the tort of negligence for their work. Discuss the case and its implications of risk for forensics or security experts involved in the investigation and presentation of findings within the legal process. à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Expert witnesses lose 400-year-old immunityà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  [1]Lawgazette.co.uk. This title appeared in the Law Society Gazette on March 30th 2011 following a Supreme Court decision in Jones v Kaney ([2011] UKSC 13) abolishing expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ immunity from suit. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Professionalism in Forensics Computing" essay for you Create order The immunity of expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ have been challenged a number of times, most of which occurred after the case of Hall v Simons ([2000] UKHL 38) [2]where advocatesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ immunity has been abolished. It has been questioned whether expert witnesses should be treated the same as the witnesses of facts, and whether the immunity is necessary. The case of Jones v Kaney (2011) considered a dispute over an expert witness service provided by Dr Kaney to the court in personal injury case which also considered Mr. Jones. In that case, the claimant was involved in road accident causing him physical and psychiatric injuries. His solicitor has then instructed Dr Kaney to advise the court about the (psychiatric) health condition of the claimant. In her initial report she stated that the victim suffered from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The other side raised an objection on the basis that the expert witness hired on behalf of the insurance company acknowle dged that it may only have been exaggeration by Mr Jones which may or may not have been conscious. After the raised dispute, the expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ were instructed to hold a discussion, which took place in November 2005. It was then held in the form of the joint statement signed by the both parties that Kaney agreed that the psychiatric injury that Jones has suffered was not PTSD, but only an adjustment reaction. She has also suggested that he might, in purpose, give the experts incorrect information. When Kaney was asked for reasoning of her indecisiveness she explained that she felt to be under the pressure of agreeing to the document and that it did not exactly represent her view. Whilst being interviewed she upheld that Jones suffered from PTSD however it was no longer relevant after the joint statement was signed. Her actions have weakened Jonesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ claim significantly, and subsequently, the personal injury claim was settled outside the court roo m.[3] Jones issued a claim for professional negligence against Kaney in respect of a road traffic case which had to be settled for considerably lesser amount due to Kaneyà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s change of her expert witness statement. He argued that à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“It was alleged (but not proved, because the case proceeded as a strike out application on assumed facts) that she had negligently agreed the terms of a joint statement with the opposing expert without seeing her opponentà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s report, under pressure to sign and despite the fact that it did not truly reflect her viewà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  https://www.kchgardensquare.co.uk/[4] Although Kanye did try to strike out on the basis that Stanton v Callaghan 1998 case upheld that the expert witness may not be sued for negligence when preparing the joint statement, a certificate under section 12 of the Administration of Justice Act 1969 was granted (in the high court) allowing Jones to go straight through Supreme Court. The appeal was heard in January 2011 by 7 judges, which by majority (5/7) allowed the appeal which at the same time meant overruling the Stanton v Callaghan 1998. It also meant that the immunity from suite for expert witness is abolished by the decision of the Supreme Court. The majority decision considered that it was up to the Kaney to justify why the immunity from the suite should be upheld. It was a concern for the judges whether the joint statement should remain immune from the suit. Lord Phillips expressed his surprise that the immunity from the suite in regards to the expert witnesses have not yet been challenged. He noted that the immunity was first upheld in Cutler v Dixon (1585) before the tort of negligence was hardly developed. Lord Phillip stated that the expertsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ witnesses are benefiting the court voluntary and doing so for the payment. He felt that abolishing the immunity from suit would not impact the evidence giving at court, even though it will b e possible to suit them for negligence. He notes that the aspect of giving the evidence at could will be looked upon differently, however it should not discourage expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ from giving their testimony at court. Lord Phillips comment the decision of Hall v Simons (2001) to be incorrect in the respect that it failed to distinguish between the expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ and witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ of facts. He states that the expert witness besides of having a duty to serve the court, also have a binding contract agreement with the client. At this occasion he states that the expert witnesses are more like advocates in the respect of having a duty to the court and the client. It is in his opinion that removing the immunity from the advocates has not lead to any decrease of such professionals performing their duty. He then concluded that there was no justification to uphold the immunity for breach of duty and should therefore be abolished. Lord Br own has added that the abolishing the expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ will impact the quality of the services provided positively and so that it will limit the experts to give exactly what they were asked for to avoid embarrassment. This was to be due establishing initially by the experts whether their client case is not too high, or inflexible. Lord Collins has also added that it will give the client the right to retrieve appropriate remedy for insufficient services provided by the expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢. Lastly Lord Kerr adds that there should be no fear about changing the decision from the original if such need is required. As long as it is held truthfully and there are strong grounds to do so. On the other side, there were 2 judges that were voting to uphold the decision to maintain the expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ immunity from being suit. Lord Hope and Lady Hale felt not to be in the position of removing the à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“long standingà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  immunity, and they have expressed that it should be up to the consideration of the Law Commission and Parliament and not the Supreme Court at all. Lord Hope expressed that the immunity was in place for the expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ to come and give their testimony voluntarily without being in fear of being suit by the employing party. It was his concern that removing the immunity was one way process and without the legislation it will not be possible to overrule the decision. His fears are that the decision will destabilise the protection give to witnesses in general. Lord Hope disagrees with the concept of getting a remedy for what has been done wrong because of the impact it will have on expertsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ work. He establishes a potential problem that derives from the decision, namely how to amend the decision to allow the expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ be suite under the negligence but not for defamation. He pointed out that the roles of advocates and expert witnesses differ and therefore cannot be compared. Lady Hale was concerned about the consequences of the decision. She pointed than rather than changing their original submission, the expert witnesses will be more likely to confirm the original decision, even if they believed it is wrong, in order to prevent being suit for the negligence. This may have substantially impact the duty to court and the reliability on which the court has to base the decision. She concluded stating that the decision was irresponsible in the context of law, and the decision should not be made by the judges but the legislative body. Historically the immunity for the expert witnesses was first establishedin Curtler v Dixon (1585). Originally immunity from suite was known as an absolute privilege to all the parties that took part in the legal proceeding, and was also recognised (Dawkins v Rokeby (1873)LR 8 QB 255)[5], and was later clarified in the form of immunity from suit(Hargreaves v Bretherton [1 959] 1QB 45)[6]. The justifications, as stated in Darker v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [2001] 1 AC 435[7] for immunity of witnesses in general stated: To protect witnesses who have given evidence in good faith from being harassed and vexed by unjustified claims. To encourage honest and well meaning persons to assist justice. To secure that the witness will speak freely and fearlessly.[8] What is more appealing to the expert witnessà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ immunity is the case of Stanton v Callaghan [1998]EWCA Civ 1176 (which was overruled by Jones v Kaney). The case has upheld that immunity had protected Callaghan who was accused for breach of retainer and negligence. It must be mentioned at this point that Jones have not suit Kaney on the basis that she changed her decision à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" which is allowed by the Civil Procedure rule Part 35(para 2.5)[9], if there are reasonable grounds to do so. Jones has accused Kaney of being negligent by signing a document because of the outside pressures. Furthermore she has not seen the opposing party expertà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s report, the joint statement did not set out what were her reflections and still, she has signed it. Once the expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ immunity from suit was abolished, the case returned to High Court. There were a number of risks that was carried with the overruling decision some of which were expressed by Lord Hope and Lady Hale. The identified risks was decrease in the truthfulness on the expert witness side because rather than changing their original decision and exposing themselves with a possibility of being suite, it would be rather easier to go with what has been already submitted. There was a possibility in the decrease of the expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ willing to take part in the trail from the fear and the pressure that was put upon the expert witnesses. On the same level, there is a problem in regards to the difference between the negligence and defamation. The dfference between the two terms is very thin however these are still two completely different terms. Defamation refers directly to the words spoken, and is more sophisticated word for à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“lyingà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . It is defamation when the person is not telling the truth, the information given was hearsay and the words have harmed or caused a loss to an individual. Whereas the negli gence is neither intentional, nor planned but may have cause some type of injury. It is therefore unclear as to where the border line draws, although only the immunity for being suit for negligence has been abolished. Some of the judges have also mentioned the Civil Procedure Rules that applies to this case. There is a specifically designed part in the CPR that relates directly to the expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢, CPR Part 35 and accompanying supplement which is directed to the reports. CPR Part 35 setà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s out the rules for the advocates and the expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ as to the correctness of information, duties in court, requirements for the expert witness report, single joint experts and so on. It is important that the Justice system provides such professional with guidelines which should be followed when serving the court. Some may argue that if an individual will apply the guidelines into the investigation and presentation process, it is s afe to say that the negligence would not apply. However it must be remembered that the negligence is the unconscious act, and therefore there is no guarantee that that the expert will be completely safe. Besides of CPR which outlines the correctness of the report, and the structure that is applied when the expert witness is hired, there is also an ACPO guideline. The ACPO guides the experts whose job is to investigate a case with 4 principles which should have been maintained at all times. à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“No data should be changed, the data may only be changed if it is a necessity, an audit of trail must be kept at all times, and person in charge is responsible for the evidenceà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . Although I is not directly relevant to the negligence claims being allowed, if at least the two guidelines were applied to the investigation and the person himself, it would substantially decrease the chance of being negligent at any stage of the investigation or presentation. Unfortuna tely, in reality these are only the guidelines for the expert witness. The drawback of it is that it does not give the individual guarantee to not be suit. For this reason it may be that the experts will apply what I refer to as à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“minimalist approachà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . What I mean about the minimalist approach is that the investigation for the case will be kept to the bare minimum to decrease any chances of being negligent at any stage of investigation/presentation. This may also impact the amount of information provided by the expert witnesses, because they only perform the tasks they were specifically asked to perform. The drawback may be enormous. Because the experts are only performing to the minimal standards set out by the client, the information provided back will also be minimal. If this would influence the amount of work which may now decrease due to fear of being suit, it may be possible to observe the success rate of the convictions which have employed expert witness. Moreover, on top of what has already been discussed, there are a number of factors that may impact individual experts, and their opinion. In my opinion the most common factor will be the additional stress that lies upon the experts, to pedantically apply to the procedures and rules in order not to leave any chances of being suit. A pressure, which made Dr Kaney sign the joint statement will now be even more affecting the experts and their opinion. Although there are a number of risks associated with the abolition of the immunity from being suite, there are also potential benefits that may serve the court as well as the client. It is now on behalf of the expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ to ensure the best quality of service is provided. This includes assessing the data/information more carefully and providing the parties with the more accurate statements and balanced reasoning. On the client side, it provides an assurance policy that if the expert was neglect at any stage of the trail; it gives the possibility to seek the remedy. It is now clear what was the reasoning behind the overruling the decision which was upheld in Stanton v Callaghan ([1998]EWCA Civ 1176) and the impact it had on the forensic and security expert witnesses. The question now is, why was the decision overruled, abolishing the experts immunity from being suit after 400 years. Well, Lord Phillips give us an indication of why it might have been. At the time the immunity was established (1585) the tort of law negligence was not much developed. It was assumed for a number of years that the expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ had to be correct about their proceedings and testimonies, only in the late 19th century it started to be questioned. However the immunity was upheld for another 100 years. It was then challenged a lot more frequently as society got more educated and mishaps were discovered. Abolishing the immunity as described during the Jones v Kaney was a à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã… “healthy developmentà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ [10], which was directed to refresh the legal system in this domain. One may argue that the decision was reasonable. It provided the client with the assurance of being able to suit the expert witness for his negligence. A number of cases up until this point have tried and not succeeded in this area, making the expert witnesses untouchable even if there was a clear evidence of his negligent behaviour. On the other hand it may be argued that the decision was not reasonable, and as Lady Hale has pointed out, was not up to the Supreme Court to decide on such important and long lasted legislation. It has opened up a new broad area not only in expert witness field but also in witness of facts. Moreover it has to be distinguished between the negligence and defamation. One of the arguments that cannot be argued is that the decision was in benefit for the public interest. The only concern may be an opening floodgate for negligent claims regarding t he expert witnesses. The final point to be made in this article is the analysis of the risks balancing benefits and whether abolishing the immunity was for better or for the worst? It must be considered that the abolition of the immunity was challenged by 7 judges out of which 5 voted to remove it, and so it was. The rationale behind it was that the world has moved on since 1585 and a number of things have changed. One of the major impacts was the technological advancement that took place over the last 50 years. In regards to the forensics and security experts this causes a lot of issues to follow the most recent technological trends, know all the software and devices that has to be investigated, and it keeps changing on a day-to-day basis. This have made it harder to proceed with established procedures and chances for negligent action is fairly high as compared to, for example the medicine. On the benefit side it must be considered that it has been abolished for the public interest, giving the clients more manoeuvring space when it comes to negligence by the expert that was hired. It must be concluded that the risks are balancing the benefits and there are people that support the idea and those that are opposite. The importance now, is that the immunity has been abolished and every efforts needs to be put in by the expert witnessesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢ to make sure to comply with the rules, regulations and the guidelines set by the governing body. It must be remembered at all times that the law is designed to benefit the experts giving them a number of tools, which if followed correctly will not cause issues. Word Count: 2994 Page | 1 [1] https://www.lawgazette.co.uk/59804.article [2] Link do sprawy [3] High Court decision, paras. 4à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å"5 [4] https://www.kchgardensquare.co.uk/userfiles/files/KCHGS-JonesvKaney.pdf [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part35/pd_part35#IDAXKD2 [10]

Creative Writing- Fastest Land Craft on Earth Essay examples

The sand was hot, my face dripping with sweat. Taking a drink of water I looked at the vast open desert that will be below me in only a few short moments. Preparing for years on end, I stepped in and sat down. Twisting knobs and setting switches, I flipped the ignition. The giant dual engines came to life with an enormous roar with the slight hint of a whistle. Sand swept into the sky creating a wicked dust storm. â€Å"30 second to launch!!† a man behind several computer screens shouted into the headset. When the gas lever was pulled, no one was ready for what happened next. â€Å"Time trial one is about to begin, anyone on the track should evacuate to the necessary safety area immediately! Time trial one will start in two minutes.† The loud†¦show more content†¦Although it was not driven to its full potential, it was proven to be stable and safe to drive at top-notch speeds. In 1997, Myself and the team had been flown over to Nevada in the United States; this is where the real tests begin. A mixture of Gypsum and water marked the track with 2 even lines cutting through the desert. I, being a pilot, was very casual about driving the Thrust SSC. The first runs would be completed today; all of the crew was ready for what may or may not happen. All of the Thrust SSC’s crew wanted to break the sound barrier, but surely didn’t know if it would happen. We simply didn’t know how fast it was capable of. Preparing in my quarters, I put on my fire resistant racing suit, grabbed my helmet and headed outside for the tests. Walki ng across the desert, I could literally see the heat on the horizon. Today the clouds were limited, the sky was blue, and the sun was blazing. Stepping into the car, I took a big gulp of water and stared down the track. Concentrating closely on the thin white lines I am to follow across the desert. Slowly sitting down into the seat, latching myself in, I wondered what it was going to be like. A reporter once asked me what it was like speeding at over 700 mph, what did the outside world look like? I simply answered, â€Å"The same as stationary, but faster.† Up until thisShow MoreRelatedInnovators Dna84615 Words   |  339 Pagesinspire more.† Chairman of the Executive Committee, Intuit Inc. â€Å" e Innovator’s DNA sheds new light on the once-mysterious art of innovation by showing that successful innovators exhibit common behavioral habits—habits that can boost anyone’s creative capacity.† author, e 7 Habits of Highly E ective People and e Leader in Me â€Å"Having worked with Clayton Christensen on innovation for over a decade, I can see that e Innovator’s DNA continues to stretch our thinking with insights that challenge Read MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 PagesBradley H. Dowden Philosophy Department California State University Sacramento Sacramento, CA 95819 USA ii iii Preface Copyright  © 2011-14 by Bradley H. Dowden This book Logical Reasoning by Bradley H. Dowden is licensed under a Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. That is, you are free to share, copy, distribute, store, and transmit all or any part of the work under the following conditions: (1) Attribution You must attribute the work in theRead More65 Successful Harvard Business School Application Essays 2nd Edition 147256 Words   |  190 Pagesof The Harbus, the Harvard Business School newspaper / Lauren Sullivan and the staff of The Harbus.-2nd ed. p.em. ISBN 978...0..312...55007...3 1. Business schools-United States-Admission. 2. Exposition (Rhetoric) 3. Essay-Authorship. 4. Business writing. 5. Harvard Business School. 1. Sullivan, Lauren. II. Harbus. III. Title: Sixty...five successful Harvard Business School application essays. HF1131.A1352009 808.06665-dc22 2009012531 First Edition: August 2009 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CONTENTS Read MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 PagesDiagnostic Surveys for Creative Problem Solving 168 Problem Solving, Creativity, and Innovation 168 How Creative Are You ? 169 Innovative Attitude Scale 171 Creative Style Assessment 172 SKILL LEARNING 174 Problem Solving, Creativity, and Innovation 174 Steps in Analytical Problem Solving 174 Defining the Problem 174 Generating Alternatives 176 Evaluating Alternatives 176 Implementing the Solution 177 Limitations of the Analytical Problem-Solving Model 178 Impediments to Creative Problem Solving 178Read MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pagesprevious epochs, Tucker focuses on how the exponential increase in human reliance on fossil fuel energy sources over the course of the long twentieth century has degraded the land, water, and air of the planetary environment. From multinational corporations to impoverished peasants burning away the rain forest for land to plant their crops or pasture their cattle, he seeks to identify the specific agents responsible for both pollution and ecological degradation. And he tracks underlying trendsRead MoreContemporary Issues in Management Accounting211377 Words   |  846 Pagesasserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2006 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, OxfordRead MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pages L L L Self-Assessment Library What Are My Gender Role Perceptions? 166 glOBalization! Chinese Time, North American Time 171 Myth or Science? Creative Decision Making Is a Right-Brain Activity 181 Self-Assessment Library Am I A Deliberate Decision Maker? 183 An Ethical Choice Whose Ethical Standards to Follow? 185 Self-Assessment Library How Creative Am I? 190 Point/Counterpoint Checklists Lead to Better Decisions 191 CONTENTS xi Questions for Review 192 Experiential Exercise BiasesRead MoreCrossing the Chasm76808 Words   |  308 Pagesof this book who is also a practitioner of high-tech market development has my deepest respect. With that thought in mind, let me turn you over now to Regis McKenna, author of the original Foreword back in 1991, and then to a fledgling author writing his first acknowledgments. Foreword Within an ever-changing society, marketing represents the ongoing effort to keep the means of production—our products and services—in touch with evolving social and personal conditions. That â€Å"keeping inRead MoreMarketing Mistakes and Successes175322 Words   |  702 PagesMetLife: Deceptive Sales Practices Ford Explorers with Firestone Tires: A Killer Scenario Ill Handled 335 351 Conclusions: What We Can Learn 380 Chapter 24 Index 333 365 400 CHAPTER ONE Introduction A t this writing, Marketing Mistakes has passed its thirtieth anniversary. Who would have thought? The first edition, back in 1976, was 147 pages and included such long-forgotten cases as Korvette, W. T. Grant, Edsel, Corfam, Gilbert, and the Midi. In this eleventhRead MoreManaging Information Technology (7th Edition)239873 Words   |  960 Pagesto only one other statewide chamber of commerce organization, the Northern State Chamber of Commerce. Jeff Fritzly, Vice President of Marketing and Development of the NSCC, told Lassiter: We looked at quite a few software packages as well as writing our own custom software, but our consultant chose the UNITRAK software. We purchased the software from UNITRAK and got a good discount on the needed new hardware. They have been very helpful and supportive of our needs. A week before the Executive

Semiotic Analysis Free Essays

2012 Unit Profile Unit Code Unit Title Provider Unit Type Level of Study EFTSL Delivery Method SGY110 Australian and Global Society Macquarie University UGRD Undergraduate Level 1 0. 125 Fully Online Unit Overview Commence your studies of society by learning about the sociological framework and establish skills for life. You will be introduced to many of the ways in which sociologists think about the most intimate aspects of life – such as sexuality, the family and gender – as well as to larger and often impersonal structural features, such as social class, the labour market and social policy. We will write a custom essay sample on Semiotic Analysis or any similar topic only for you Order Now You will also have the opportunity to use social research techniques such as interviews and observation in the real world, as well as to uncover the secrets often hidden in other sources of information and data. Topics 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. What is sociology? History of sociology and key ideas What is a social fact? Australian families Gender, language and domination The life course – growing up in the 21st century Religion and social change Media, race and ethnicity Class and inequality Work, employment and society Crime and society Globalisation: the world as social context Learning Outcomes At the completion of this unit students will: 1. be familiar with the key sociological concepts as they are applied to the study of Australian society 2. be aware of existing patterns of social structure and the processes and nature of change currently taking place 3. ave developed a broad understanding of the nature and methods of social science 4. be able to use basic social research skills to undertake some types of original, primary research under supervision. Page 1 2012 Unit Profile Assessment – Non-Invigilated Exam – Take Home Exam (30%) Online Discussion (15%) Report1 – Investigative Report (40%) Report2 – Thematic Activity Report (15%) Textbooks Prerequisites Spe cial Requirements This unit does not have a prescribed textbook(s). – Broadband access Page 2 How to cite Semiotic Analysis, Essay examples

Heinrich Himmler Essay Example For Students

Heinrich Himmler Essay Heinrich Himmler was Reichsfuhrer-SS (Reich SS Leader) and Chief of the German police. In this capacity, he was responsible for the implementation of the Final Solution the extermination of the Jews as ordered by the Fuhrer, Adolf Hitler. He was born in Munich on October 7, 1900. His father was the son of a police president, a former tutor to the princes of the Bavarian court, and a headmaster by profession. Himmler originally intended to be a farmer and in fact acquired a degree in agronomy. He fought in World War I at the every end, and afterwards drifted into one of the many right wing soldiers organizations that were so prevalent at the time. It is here that he came into contact with Hitler. He took part in the Hitler Putsch (the attempt to overthrow the government) of 1923 as a standard-bearer. He married Margret Boden in 1926. In 1929, Hitler appointed him head of the SS, which at that time numbered about 300 men and served mainly as a bodyguard for Hitler. A superb organizer, he had already expanded the SS to 50,000 men by 1933By 1936, he had consolidated police power in Germany and was named Chief of the German police on June 17 of that year. With all organs of the police, especially the Gestapo (secret state police), now under his control, his power was virtually without limit. In addition to his other responsibilities, he was also responsible for the security services (Sicherheitsdienst) and the concentration camps, which up to that time housed prisoners of the state. Himmlers men staged the phony border incident that Hitler used to justify the invasion of Poland at the outbreak of World War II. As the war went on, the armored portions of the SS the Waffen SS began to rival the Armed Forces for power in the military field, culminating in Himmlers being named Minister of the Interior in 1943 and chief of the Replacement Army in 1944. Right up to the end, he was one of Hitlers most loyal men. Hitler called him der treue Heinrich (loyal Heinrich). When it came time for Hitler to order the annihilation of the Jews, who better to select to carry it out than the man who was at once his most loyal follower and also in control of the apparatus necessary for its execution? And that is what Hitler did. The precise date is not known, but what is known is that Himmler obeyed the order he received with his customary thoroughness and efficiency. Interestingly enough, for a man who has been demonized as the incarnation of evil, Himmler makes it clear in several speeches that he was not particularly antisemitic. He simply blindly obeyed, displaying almost more amorality than immorality. Whatever misgivings Himmler may have had, he carried out his orders with an efficiency and a zeal that at once astonish and repel. The first murders were carried out by Einsatzgruppen by shooting. As deadly as these shootings were, a more efficient method had to be found, one that would accelerate the killing and would at the same time spare the SS men the necessity to murder women and children in cold blood. The decision was made to use poison gases (hydrocyanic acid and carbon monoxide) in both stationary and mobile gas chambers in Poland. It is estimated that around 6 million Jews were killed during the Final Solution, along with as many as another 6 million non-Jews. At the end of the war, Himmler made attempts to negotiate peace through the World Jewish Congress. .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2 , .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2 .postImageUrl , .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2 , .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2:hover , .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2:visited , .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2:active { border:0!important; } .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2:active , .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2 .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ua9e1707fd65427e6e169675c0315bfe2:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: F. Scott Fitzgerald was a writer during the Jazz A Essay Attempting to flee in disguise in May 1945, he was captured by British forces and admitted his identity. When a doctor was ordered to search him to ensure he did not have poison secreted on his person, he bit down on a cyanide capsule hidden in his mouth and was dead in a few minutes. Like Hitler, he chose suicide as his way to exit the world. At a speech in Posen on October 4, 1943, Himmler uttered the words that Joachim Fest has described as one of the most horrifying testaments in the German language: 1 I am talking about

The Pagoda by Patricia Powell

Introduction ‘Pagoda,’ a book by Patricia Powell talks about a big secret. Lowe, a Chinese immigrant who runs a shop in Jamaica, is trapped between black and white villagers and faces threats from both groups. After living together with Miss Sylvie for convenience for thirty five years, their marriage changes to be a marriage of love as they come into reality with revelations of their past.Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on The Pagoda by Patricia Powell specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Separation from her daughter for more than twelve years makes Lowe to write a letter with details of the origin of their family. Prior to the completion of the letter, the shop was reduced down to ashes together with Cecil, the person who fetched her to Jamaica, mistreated her sexually and who assisted her in putting up the shop. As a result of this incident, Lowe began a new life as a result of the freedom fr om debts of Cecil. She decides to build a Pagoda, school and a social place where all Chinese citizens could meet. As she engaged in these activities, she struggled to come out of the fact that she had lost his livelihood as well as drifting from Chinese culture and the prevailing secret of her family. Faking identity Lowe had escaped her marriage more than thirty five years ago by going away on a ship to Jamaica, and being unaware that the ship had more than five hundred Chinese men who had been forcefully taken from China and were bound for forced labor. Due to the fact that Chinese women are never allowed to immigrate to foreign countries, Lowe camouflages herself as a man and maintains the same identity for more than thirty years. The author tries to bring out implications which destiny and freedom can have on an individuals’ life regarding gender and family relationships. Kidnapping of Chinese men to provide cheap labor in the sugar plantations in Jamaica is also documen ted. Living conditions in China in the late 1800s was harsh making Lowe to search for new prospects in the Island of Jamaica. Lowe began realizing many losses in life after the grocery shop was burnt down, including the loss of her daughter, language, historical background and identity. These led her to intend to live a genuine life including building the Pagoda, a social cultural centre for the Chinese people. As she began the new life, a revelation of a life of fake identity, historical violence and betrayal was unfolded. She recognizes that she is not the only one with the dark past, but also Miss Sylvie. Lowe and Sylvie continue sharing their past but something else comes up, Lowe has an affair with a black Jamaican woman called Joyce which makes Sylvie to run away because she could not hold the past experiences.Advertising Looking for critical writing on literature languages? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Afterwards, L owe realized that she genuinely loved Miss Sylvie and thereby writing a letter to her daughter Elizabeth. Submerged in misery and lamentation, Lowe admits in the letter that she has never lived her life fully but through faking identities. According to the author (Powell,117), the character of Sylvie as a woman surpassed the boundaries imposed upon women in the late 19th century by depicting her as an autonomous, rich and influential owner of land. She is forced to tackle the past full of wrong choices, deceit and masked identity. Lowe deals with problems of injustice in Jamaica in an area dominated by the blacks and her target is to cut across racism and get recognition within the society. However, the struggle of Lowe with identity is much emphasized than any other character in the book. The years of lies have lowered Lowes’ spirit to the extent that ‘self’ had no meaning in her life but just a collection of fiction. She no longer knew the beginning or the end of some things happening in her life, whether her stories corresponded or whether people understood the gaps in links. Despite the frustrations and difficulties that she undergoes, Lowe goes on with the dream of building the Pagoda so that Chinese living in Jamaica can have a place to refresh and practice their traditions and experience their identities. The author tries to investigate colorfully the fertile heritage and landscape of Jamaica in the late 19th century. Conclusion The context of the story is interesting because of the nature of the community involved, a Chinese community in Jamaica while Lowe, the main character, revolves around with issues related to gender identity. I was a little bit unsatisfied with the main character in the story because she had big challenges in her life while she kept other people out of her life, at the same time she seemed discontented with her life. There is lack of connection, relationships among people in the story while the author tries to bring out lack of hope in the bid to build a community of Chinese people in Jamaica. Towards the end of the story, there seems to be optimism concerning pardon and love, but remains only to be hope in the authors’ imagination but not in the written context.Advertising We will write a custom critical writing sample on The Pagoda by Patricia Powell specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Works Cited Powell, Patricia. The Pagoda. New York: Knopf, 1998. This critical writing on The Pagoda by Patricia Powell was written and submitted by user Paloma Q. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.